摘要： 目的:探討高強(qiáng)度間歇訓(xùn)練(HIIT)相比中強(qiáng)度持續(xù)訓(xùn)練(MICT)對(duì)超重/肥胖成人體重與體脂率的干預(yù)是否更具優(yōu)勢(shì)。方法:通過(guò)檢索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science與中國(guó)知網(wǎng)(中文核心期刊)數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù),搜集HIIT與MICT干預(yù)超重/肥胖成人體重與體脂率的隨機(jī)對(duì)照試驗(yàn)(RCT)與臨床對(duì)照試驗(yàn)(CCT),采用風(fēng)險(xiǎn)偏倚評(píng)價(jià)對(duì)納入文獻(xiàn)進(jìn)行質(zhì)量評(píng)估,STATA 13.1軟件進(jìn)行合并效應(yīng)量分析和亞組分析。結(jié)果:共納入文獻(xiàn)10篇,其中低、中度與高風(fēng)險(xiǎn)文獻(xiàn)分別為4篇、4篇與2篇。納入文獻(xiàn)中HIIT與MICT組總樣本量分別為119個(gè)與114個(gè)。Meta分析結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn),與MICT相比,HIIT對(duì)超重/肥胖成人體重(WMD=-0.18,95% CI:-1.03～0.66,P=0.67)與體脂率(WMD=-0.38,95% CI:-1.02～0.27,P=0.25)的影響均不顯著。亞組分析結(jié)果顯示,超重指標(biāo)中多訓(xùn)練次數(shù)的“≥48次”亞組(WMD=-1.51,95% CI:-2.73～-0.29,P=0.016)具有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義;體脂率指標(biāo)中長(zhǎng)周期的“12周”亞組(WMD =-0.73,95% CI:-1.49～0.03,P=0.061)與多訓(xùn)練次數(shù)的“≥48次”亞組(WMD=-1.14,95% CI:-2.43～0.15,P=0.084)均出現(xiàn)邊界顯著效應(yīng)。結(jié)論:HIIT與MICT相比在降低超重/肥胖成人的體重與體脂率方面的作用無(wú)明顯差異。

關(guān)鍵詞: 高強(qiáng)度間歇訓(xùn)練, 中強(qiáng)度持續(xù)訓(xùn)練, 超重, 肥胖, 體脂率, Meta分析

Abstract: Objective: To determine the effectiveness of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on body mass and body fat percentage in overweight and obese adults, in comparison with moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT). Methods: Four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure) were searched for randomized controlled trial (RCT) or clinical controlled trial (CCT) comparing the effect of HIIT and MICT on body mass and fat percentage in overweight and obese adults. The risk of bias assessment was performed for each of the included studies. The meta-analysis was performed by using STATA 13.1. Results: Ten studies, including 119 participants in HIIT and 114 participants in MICT, met the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. No statistically significant difference between HIIT and MICT was observed for body mass (WMD=-0.18,95% CI:-1.03～0.66,P=0.67) and fat percentage (WMD=-0.38, 95% CI: -1.02～0.27, P=0.25). However, a significant reduction in body mass following HIIT compared with MICT was observed in subgroups "48 times" (WMD=-1.51,95% CI:-2.73～-0.29,P=0.016), while marginally significant reduction in fat% following HIIT compared with MICT was observed in subgroups "12 weeks" (WMD =-0.73, 95% CI: -1.49～0.03, P=0.061) and "48 times" (WMD=-1.14,95% CI:-2.43～0.15,P=0.084). Conclusion: The effects of HIIT and MICT

Key words: High-intensity Interval Training, Moderate-intensity Continuous Training, Overweight, Obesity, Body Fat Percentage, meta-analysis

中圖分類號(hào): 

G804.5

相關(guān)知識(shí)

高強(qiáng)度間歇訓(xùn)練與中強(qiáng)度持續(xù)訓(xùn)練對(duì)中國(guó)超重或肥胖人群干預(yù)效果比較的Meta分析
高強(qiáng)度間歇訓(xùn)練與中等強(qiáng)度持續(xù)運(yùn)動(dòng)對(duì)超重/肥胖青年女性人群干預(yù)效果比較的Meta分析
高強(qiáng)度間歇訓(xùn)練與中強(qiáng)度持續(xù)訓(xùn)練對(duì)超重/肥胖成人最大脂肪氧化率的干預(yù)效果與劑量
高強(qiáng)度間歇訓(xùn)練和中等強(qiáng)度持續(xù)訓(xùn)練對(duì)健康成人心肺適能影響的Meta分析
高強(qiáng)度間歇訓(xùn)練（HIIT）與中等強(qiáng)度持續(xù)訓(xùn)練（MICT）對(duì)肥胖癥的影響
高強(qiáng)度間歇訓(xùn)練對(duì)超重肥胖女大學(xué)生減脂效果的Meta分析
與中等強(qiáng)度持續(xù)訓(xùn)練相比，高強(qiáng)度間歇訓(xùn)練對(duì)超重和肥胖成人身體成分和胰島素敏感性的影響：系統(tǒng)評(píng)價(jià)和薈萃分析,Heliyon
高強(qiáng)度間歇訓(xùn)練對(duì)不同訓(xùn)練人群的應(yīng)用效果
高強(qiáng)度間歇訓(xùn)練對(duì)健康體適能的影響
高強(qiáng)度間歇訓(xùn)練在冠心病病人心臟康復(fù)中應(yīng)用效果的Meta分析

網(wǎng)址: 高強(qiáng)度間歇訓(xùn)練與中強(qiáng)度持續(xù)訓(xùn)練對(duì)超重/肥胖成人體成分干預(yù)作用的比較:Meta分析 http://m.u1s5d6.cn/newsview1280959.html