首頁(yè) 資訊 別被標(biāo)簽忽悠了,健康果蔬汁真的營(yíng)養(yǎng)么—論文—科學(xué)網(wǎng)

別被標(biāo)簽忽悠了,健康果蔬汁真的營(yíng)養(yǎng)么—論文—科學(xué)網(wǎng)

來(lái)源:泰然健康網(wǎng) 時(shí)間:2024年12月08日 06:11

論文標(biāo)題:5-a-day fruit and vegetable food product labels: reduced fruit and vegetable consumption following an exaggerated compared to a modest label

期刊:BMC Public Health

作者:K. M. Appleton et al

發(fā)表時(shí)間: 2018/5/15

數(shù)字識(shí)別碼:10.1186/s12889-018-5528-0

原文鏈接:https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-018-5528-0?utm_source=WeChat&utm_medium=Social_media_organic&utm_content=DaiDen-BMC-BMC_Public_Health-Food_Science_and_Technology-China&utm_campaign=BMCS_USG_BSCN_DD_PUBLICH_BLOG

BMC Public Health最新發(fā)表的一篇文章比較了果蔬汁產(chǎn)品使用“含有世界衛(wèi)生組織標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的每日五份果蔬之一”與“含有世界衛(wèi)生組織標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的每日五份果蔬之三”的標(biāo)簽如何影響消費(fèi)者對(duì)果蔬產(chǎn)品的后續(xù)食用。

世界衛(wèi)生組織提出了每日五份果蔬的標(biāo)準(zhǔn),但食品飲料標(biāo)簽上聲稱(chēng)滿(mǎn)足每日五份果蔬的營(yíng)養(yǎng)標(biāo)簽真的能說(shuō)明這些產(chǎn)品是健康食品么?

無(wú)論總量多少,由于果汁的加工過(guò)程和加工造成的纖維減少,世界衛(wèi)生組織推薦僅將果汁作為每日五份果蔬的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)中的一份。如果產(chǎn)品聲稱(chēng)含有兩份或更多的果蔬,則該產(chǎn)品應(yīng)來(lái)自多種水果或蔬菜,并且還應(yīng)確保份量適中,并且控制其中飽和脂肪、鹽和糖的含量。

盡管各國(guó)政府都制定了相關(guān)標(biāo)準(zhǔn),但制造商有時(shí)會(huì)自行在包裝上添加聲明,而這并不在政府規(guī)定的范圍之內(nèi)。如果制造商遵循行業(yè)中最嚴(yán)格的執(zhí)行標(biāo)準(zhǔn),符合規(guī)定的產(chǎn)品每份中應(yīng)該含有80g或更多的果蔬。

突出產(chǎn)品健康成分的食品標(biāo)簽可以對(duì)健康飲食搭配產(chǎn)生積極影響,但是如果產(chǎn)品的“健康成分”被夸大,也可能會(huì)導(dǎo)致負(fù)面影響。

基于此,伯恩茅斯大學(xué)的研究人員進(jìn)行了一項(xiàng)研究,并于近期發(fā)表于BMC Public Health。該研究調(diào)查了標(biāo)有“含有每日五份之三”與“含有每日五份之一”的果蔬汁產(chǎn)品對(duì)后續(xù)果蔬攝入的影響。使用急性實(shí)驗(yàn)設(shè)計(jì),194名參與者(90名男性,104名女性)在日常早餐之后隨機(jī)食用一份標(biāo)有“含有每日五份之三”或“含有每日五份之一”的果蔬汁。

研究使用了兩種產(chǎn)品標(biāo)簽,每種都聲明該產(chǎn)品為“果蔬汁”,并在聲明中包括了相應(yīng)的口味,分別標(biāo)明“含有每日五份之三”或“含有每日五份之一”,并且使用英國(guó)公認(rèn)的標(biāo)識(shí)表示每日五份果蔬。所有參與者被要求在食用前觀察他們的奶昔,并全部喝掉,而不會(huì)提及標(biāo)簽或相關(guān)信息。隨后對(duì)24小時(shí)內(nèi)的果蔬攝入情況進(jìn)行評(píng)估。

研究者發(fā)現(xiàn),相比于使用“含有每日五份之一”標(biāo)簽組,使用“含有每日五份之三”果蔬標(biāo)簽組在正常早餐后果蔬的后續(xù)食用量減少。這可以解釋為消費(fèi)者可能認(rèn)為他們已經(jīng)通過(guò)食用該標(biāo)簽的產(chǎn)品而超額完成了健康飲食目標(biāo),因此之后不再攝入更多果蔬。該現(xiàn)象中的主要變化通常發(fā)生在高果蔬攝入者、女性、以及蔬菜攝入而非水果中。

這項(xiàng)研究的結(jié)果表明,涉及果蔬攝入標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的食品標(biāo)簽提供夸大信息會(huì)造成隱患。為確保此類(lèi)信息的準(zhǔn)確性,需要制定更嚴(yán)格的規(guī)定。

摘要:

Background

Food product labels based on the WHO 5-a-day fruit and vegetable (FV) message are becoming increasingly common, but these labels may impact negatively on complementary or subsequent FV consumption. This study aimed to investigate the impact of a ‘3 of your 5-a-day’ versus a ‘1 of your 5-a-day’ smoothie product label on subsequent FV consumption.

Methods

Using an acute experimental design, 194 participants (90 males, 104 females) were randomised to consume a smoothie labelled as either ‘3 of your 5-a-day’ (N =?97) or ‘1 of your 5-a-day’ (N =?97) in full, following a usual breakfast. Subsequent FV consumption was measured for the rest of the day using 24-h recall. Usual FV consumption was also assessed via 24-h recall for the day before the study.

Results

Regression analyses revealed a significantly lower subsequent FV consumption following smoothies displaying the ‘3 of your 5-a-day’ label compared to the ‘1 of your 5-a-day’ label (Beta?=???0.15, p =?0.04). Secondary analyses revealed these effects to be driven mainly by changes to consumption in usual high FV consumers, in females and in vegetable as opposed to fruit consumption.

Conclusions

These findings demonstrate a role for label information in food intake, and the potential negative impacts of an exaggerated food product label on healthy food consumption and healthy dietary profiles.

閱讀論文原文,請(qǐng)?jiān)L問(wèn)

https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-018-5528-0?utm_source=WeChat&utm_medium=Social_media_organic&utm_content=DaiDen-BMC-BMC_Public_Health-Food_Science_and_Technology-China&utm_campaign=BMCS_USG_BSCN_DD_PUBLICH_BLOG

期刊介紹:BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.

2017 Journal Metrics

Citation Impact

2.420 - 2-year Impact Factor

3.039 - 5-year Impact Factor

1.268 - Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

(來(lái)源:科學(xué)網(wǎng))

特別聲明:本文轉(zhuǎn)載僅僅是出于傳播信息的需要,并不意味著代表本網(wǎng)站觀點(diǎn)或證實(shí)其內(nèi)容的真實(shí)性;如其他媒體、網(wǎng)站或個(gè)人從本網(wǎng)站轉(zhuǎn)載使用,須保留本網(wǎng)站注明的“來(lái)源”,并自負(fù)版權(quán)等法律責(zé)任;作者如果不希望被轉(zhuǎn)載或者聯(lián)系轉(zhuǎn)載稿費(fèi)等事宜,請(qǐng)與我們接洽。

相關(guān)知識(shí)

別被忽悠了!健康管理師證書(shū)沒(méi)那么神
別再被忽悠了,這才是科學(xué)的孕期飲食禁忌!
“健康食品”真的更健康嗎?別被廣告忽悠了
全民養(yǎng)生,被吹上天的“5種健康食品”,養(yǎng)生不太行,忽悠第一名
PM膳食補(bǔ)充劑:別被神奇功效忽悠了
別被忽悠了 生活中常見(jiàn)的飲食誤區(qū)
別被食品包裝上的“零添加”忽悠了
【健康】水果番茄、水果黃瓜……這些被貼上水果標(biāo)簽的蔬菜,你挑對(duì)了嗎?
果蔬汁減肥法 真的有效嗎
長(zhǎng)期16+8輕斷食使死亡率暴增91%?別被忽悠了!

網(wǎng)址: 別被標(biāo)簽忽悠了,健康果蔬汁真的營(yíng)養(yǎng)么—論文—科學(xué)網(wǎng) http://m.u1s5d6.cn/newsview357016.html

推薦資訊