第7期收稿日期:2007-07-26;修回2007-11-20 作者簡(jiǎn)介:張瑜(1983-,女,碩士研究生,從事環(huán)境監(jiān)測(cè)與質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)方面研究,(電子信箱monica8311@ ;*通訊作者,(電話025-********(電子信箱wuyizhong@ 。 POPs 污染場(chǎng)地土壤健康風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià) 張瑜,吳以中*,宗良綱,馮霞 (南京農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)資源與環(huán)境科學(xué)學(xué)院,江蘇 南京210095 摘 要:文章以常州市某化工廠為例,介紹了POPs 污染場(chǎng)地的健康風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià),分別對(duì)兩種土地利用類(lèi)型假設(shè)下土壤的3條暴露途 徑進(jìn)行估算,重點(diǎn)考慮了兒童對(duì)污染土壤的敏感性,用年齡修正因子計(jì)算居民的致癌風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。結(jié)果表明兩種假設(shè)下氯丹和滅蟻靈的致癌風(fēng)險(xiǎn)都超過(guò)了可接受的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)水平,在部分高暴露點(diǎn)甚至超過(guò)了目標(biāo)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)值的100倍,需要對(duì)場(chǎng)地進(jìn)行修復(fù)。各暴露途徑對(duì)健康風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的貢獻(xiàn)按從大到小排列依次為:直接攝入土壤﹥皮膚接觸﹥呼吸攝入。文章還根據(jù)健康風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)的公式反推出適合本污染場(chǎng)地的土壤初級(jí)修復(fù)目標(biāo)分別為:氯丹5.2mg/kg 、滅蟻靈7.4×10-1mg/kg (工業(yè)用地;氯丹1.6mg/kg 、滅蟻靈2.7×10-1mg/kg (居住用地。 關(guān)鍵詞:健康風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià);污染場(chǎng)地;POPs ;初級(jí)修復(fù)目標(biāo)中圖分類(lèi)號(hào):X820.4 文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)志碼:A 文章編號(hào):1003-6504(200807-0135-06 Health Risk Assessment :Ca se Study of a Brownfield Contaminat- ed by POPs at Changzhou ZHANG Yu ,WU Yi-zhong *,ZONG Liang-gang ,FENG Xia (School of Resource and Environment Science ,Nanjing Agriculture University ,Nanjing 210095,China Abstracts :Methodologies for health risk assessment (HRA were applied in a brownfield on abandoned industrial site con-taminated by persistent organic pollutants (POPs at Changzhou ,east China.For the defined future land use patterns ,indus-trial (I and residential (II exposure scenarios were assumed and evaluated.HRA focused on 3typical exposure pathways by soil ,which was evaluated with regard to potential risks that may pose to humans ,especially to children.Carcinogenic risks during the first 30years of life were calculated using age-adjusted factors.Results of baseline risk assessment indicated that the potential health risk has exceeded the acceptable cancer risk.Risk from exposure via ingestion contributed most ,which far outweighed the risk via inhalation.Preliminary remedial goals were calculated under the industrial scenario of 5.2and 7.4×10-1mg/kg for chlordane and mirex respectively while 1.6and 2.7×10-1mg/kg under the residential scenario.Key words :health risk assessment (HRA ;brownfield ;persistent organic pollutants (POPs ;preliminary remedial goal 持久性有機(jī)污染物(Persistent Organic Pollutants ,POPs 由于它的高度性、生物蓄積性、半揮發(fā)性和持久性[1], 已經(jīng)成為當(dāng)今一個(gè)新的全球性環(huán)境問(wèn)題。2001年5月23

相關(guān)知識(shí)

環(huán)境污染與健康風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的評(píng)估.pptx
持久性有機(jī)污染物
環(huán)境污染與健康——認(rèn)識(shí)聯(lián)系與降低風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的路徑
加強(qiáng)新污染物治理有效防范環(huán)境與健康風(fēng)險(xiǎn)
污染和環(huán)境健康問(wèn)題
醫(yī)學(xué)地理和環(huán)境健康研究的主要領(lǐng)域與進(jìn)展
環(huán)境污染
環(huán)境污染物聯(lián)合暴露的人體健康累積風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估研究進(jìn)展
環(huán)境污染與健康研究所
環(huán)境污染與人類(lèi)健康的關(guān)系

網(wǎng)址: POPs污染場(chǎng)地土壤健康風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)（23頁(yè)） http://m.u1s5d6.cn/newsview88574.html