摘要： 目前我國立法對網(wǎng)絡平臺內容審查范圍的界定不明確不合理，平臺在判斷用戶發(fā)布內容違法性時具有較大的“自由裁量權”，其阻斷或者刪除用戶所發(fā)布內容的“執(zhí)法”行為具有恣意性，對用戶的言論自由等基本權利構成了極大的威脅.為了更好地平衡網(wǎng)絡安全等公共利益與用戶言論自由等基本權利之間的關系，我國立法應對內容審查的范圍作出明確合理的界定.目前國外有3種界定標準，在對以上標準比較分析的基礎上結合我國立法背景，建議將我國網(wǎng)絡平臺內容審查范圍界定為：侵犯公法所保護法益的違法內容.

關鍵詞: 網(wǎng)絡平臺, 網(wǎng)絡安全, 內容監(jiān)管, 審查范圍, 界定標準

Abstract: At present, Chinas legislation on the scope of network platform content review is not clear and unreasonable. The network platform has great discretion in judging the illegality of users' published content, and their law enforcement behaviors of blocking or deleting users' published content are arbitrary, that poses a great threat to users basic rights such as freedom of speech. In order to achieve a good balance between the maintenance of public interests such as network security and the protection of basic rights such as freedom of speech, Chinas legislation should make a clear and reasonable definition of the scope of content censorship. At present, there are three defining standards in foreign countries. On the basis of comparative analysis of the above standards and combining with the legislative background of China, this paper proposes to define the content review scope of China's network platform as the illegal content that infringes the protection benefits of the public law.

Key words: network platform, network security, content supervision, scope of review, definition standard

相關知識

專家解讀｜王鳳嬌：《網(wǎng)絡安全審查辦法》開啟我國網(wǎng)絡安全審查新篇章
《網(wǎng)絡綜藝節(jié)目內容審核標準細則》發(fā)布94條標準規(guī)范
平臺未審查商家資質，是否要擔責？
滴滴出行被網(wǎng)絡安全審查辦公室實施網(wǎng)絡安全審查
網(wǎng)絡安全審查辦公室對“滴滴出行”啟動網(wǎng)絡安全審查
審查網(wǎng)絡意思
滴滴回應被網(wǎng)絡安全審查
滴滴出行被網(wǎng)絡安全審查
虛構病情也能在線開處方藥？網(wǎng)絡售藥平臺存在醫(yī)師審核不嚴情況
審查網(wǎng)絡意思是什么

網(wǎng)址: 網(wǎng)絡平臺內容審查范圍的界定 http://m.u1s5d6.cn/newsview1227520.html