摘要:

人的健康與地質(zhì)環(huán)境息息相關，地質(zhì)環(huán)境對人群健康的影響一直以來備受環(huán)境、地質(zhì)、醫(yī)學等多學科領域研究者的關注。在環(huán)境健康影響評估方面，已有的研究注重從化學物質(zhì)或工程建設等單一視角對健康風險進行評估，而從地球系統(tǒng)角度綜合評估地質(zhì)環(huán)境健康影響的研究尚不多見。本文提出從環(huán)境地球化學、區(qū)域地質(zhì)背景、氣候狀況及人為活動強度等多維度出發(fā)，開展基于復合視角的地質(zhì)環(huán)境健康適宜性評價指標體系與評價方法研究。本文建立了地質(zhì)健康指數(shù)（GHI）評價方法，該方法按照GHI得分情況，將區(qū)域地質(zhì)環(huán)境的健康適宜性分為優(yōu)（85分及以上）、良（75~85）、一般（60~75）、較差（50~60）和差五個等級，分別代表區(qū)域地質(zhì)環(huán)境處于極適宜、適宜、較適宜、可能適宜與不適宜人群健康的狀況。本文以浙江省安吉與龍游兩縣為例，對GHI法的應用進行了案例分析。GHI法評價結(jié)果顯示，兩地在“氣候狀況”、“地質(zhì)背景”與“人類活動強度”等三個分指數(shù)上得分相當，而在“環(huán)境地球化學”分指數(shù)上存在較大分異。這是因為安吉富硒土地農(nóng)產(chǎn)品在富硒的同時重金屬超標嚴重，而龍游富硒土地則無此類現(xiàn)象。兩地GHI總指數(shù)得分顯示，安吉地質(zhì)環(huán)境的人群健康適宜性處于“良”級（78.16分），而龍游則處于“優(yōu)”級（85.50分）。調(diào)查發(fā)現(xiàn)，兩地居民健康狀況差異不大，居民平均預期壽命均優(yōu)于全國平均水平，說明雖然安吉地質(zhì)環(huán)境存在高Cd、Ni的地球化學特征，但富硒環(huán)境起到了一定彌補作用，使得安吉整體上仍處于“適宜”人群健康的水平。GHI評價方法能夠從總體上考慮與人群健康相關的地質(zhì)環(huán)境要素，客觀反映區(qū)域地質(zhì)環(huán)境的健康適宜性狀況，評價結(jié)果可以為合理利用有益健康的地質(zhì)資源，以及規(guī)避不利健康的地質(zhì)風險提供指導。

Abstract:

BACKGROUND

Human health is closely related to the geological environment. There’re various geological environment factors affecting human health in a composite way. Geological background characteristics, including tectonic structure, lithologic features, and landform configuration shape the living conditions of human being. Climate conditions and the spatial and temporal variation characteristics influence the comfortable level for habitation. More importantly, the direct and indirect impacts of elements and chemicals in rock, soil, water, and air and biosphere on human health are comprehensive and significant. In addition, various human activities have increasingly influenced geological substances and geological processes since the Industrial Revolution, which together with natural geological factors contribute to the unique public health characteristics of a region. (Fig.1). Quantifying the impact of geological environment on human health has always been a hot topic in the study of environment, geology, and other disciplines. In terms of environmental health impact assessment, many scholars or organizations have developed different evaluation indicator systems from different research perspectives. Existing studies focus on assessing health risks from a single perspective, such as chemical substances or engineering construction, while comprehensive evaluation of the health impact of the geological environment from the perspective of the earth system is still rare. In today’s world of rapid socio-economic development, the relationship between human health and geological environment is even more complex, and single methods of evaluating environmental and population health are increasingly inadequate to cope with the increasingly complex health factors. The study of the suitability of geological environment for human health is rapidly progressing under a new theoretical framework.

RESULTS

(1) The evaluation index system. A comprehensive geological environmental health suitability evaluation index system was developed based on a composite perspective, taking into account multiple dimensions such as environmental geochemistry, regional geological background, climate conditions, and intensity of human activities. The rock strata, topography, climate conditions, as well as the geochemical quality of multiple media such as soil, water, and crops in a certain area, shape the specific lifestyle and behavioral habits of the regional population, resulting in unique regional health characteristics.　　(2) GHI evaluation method. The geological health index (GHI) evaluation method was established, which divides the health suitability of regional geological environments into five grades based on GHI scores: excellent (85 points or above), good (75-85), fair (60-75), poor (50-60), and very poor, representing the conditions of extremely suitable, suitable, moderately suitable, possibly suitable, and unsuitable for human health.　　(3) Case study. A case study was conducted in Anji and Longyou counties of Zhejiang Province using the GHI method. The overall GHI scores of the two regions indicated that the health suitability of the geological environment in Anji county was rated as “good” (78.16), while Longyou county was rated as “excellent” (85.50). The evaluation results reflected the health suitability of the regional geological environment, and could provide guidance for rational utilization of geological resources beneficial to health and avoidance of geological risks adverse to health.

DISCUSSION

(1) Principles for choosing indicators. The assessment index system was established following scientific principles, making sure the indicators are representative for general geological environment and closely related to human health. The influence of each indicator on health should be based on evidence, which can objectively reflect the difference of geological environment on population health. Furthermore, the indicators should be available in most settings and be simple to calculate. It is beneficial to have the current environmental industry or health industry standards as a reference.　　(2) Composition of the index system. The GHI index system included 15 specific indicators, which were listed in Table 1. Four sub-indexes were classified to represent the influencing factors of geological environment on human health, which were climate, geological background, environmental geochemistry characteristics and human activities. Two indicators of human comfort level, representing integrated influence of air temperature, humidity and wind, and incidence of extreme weather, were used to characterize the climate factors that affect human health. Four indicators, including regional crustal stability, natural environmental radioactivity, altitude and vegetation coverage, which were closely related to population health, were extracted to characterize the suitability of spatial characteristics of structure, rock, strata and epigenetic systems to population health. Seven indicators including environmental air quality, drinking water quality, irrigation water quality, cultivated land soil quality, agricultural product quality, water resource quantity and land resource quantity were used to characterize the environmental geochemical elements that have an important impact on population health. Human activities have influenced and changed the natural substances at global and regional scales, which have brought about significant impacts on the survival of organisms and human health. In this study, population density and per capita gross industrial and agricultural product were used to characterize the intensity of human activities.　　(3) GHI evaluation method. The evaluation of the health suitability of the geological environment was performed following the processes of data standardization, weight assignment, index score calculation and evaluation level classification. A two-step method was proposed to standardize data processing to complete the evaluation process of health suitability of the geological environment. Firstly, the environmental quality level corresponding to all indicators was determined by comparing with the national average level, national and industrial standards and specifications. Secondly, the impact of different levels of geological environmental quality on population health was evaluated with reference to literature, world and national health standards, and the degree of impact is measured with 0-100 points. The weights were assigned to each indicator according to analytic hierarchy procedure (AHP). The scores of each sub-index and total GHI index were calculated according to corresponding equation. Finally, the health suitability of regional geological environment is divided into five levels: excellent (85 points and above), good (75-85), general (60-75), poor (50-60) and bad (below 50), which respectively represent the state of extremely suitable, suitable, relatively suitable, possibly suitable and unsuitable to population health in certain regional geological environment.　　(4) Case study. A case study was conducted in Anji and Longyou counties of Zhejiang Province using the GHI method. The results showed that the two regions scored similarly in the three sub-indices of “climate conditions”, “geological background”, and “human activity intensity”, while there was a significant difference in the sub-index of “environmental geochemistry”. This was because the agricultural products in the selenium-enriched area of Anji were severely contaminated with heavy metals, while there was no such phenomenon in the selenium-enriched land of Longyou County. The overall GHI scores of the two regions indicated that the health suitability of the geological environment in Anji county was rated as “good” (78.16), while Longyou County was rated as “excellent” (85.50). However, the investigation found little difference in the health status of the residents in the two areas, with the average life expectancy of the residents in both areas higher than the national average. This suggests that although the geological environment in Anji County has high geochemical characteristics of Cd and Ni, the selenium-enriched environment has played a certain compensatory role, and Anji County still maintains an overall level of “suitable” for human health.　　(5) Limitations and future research prospects. With the rapid development of global society and economy, the relationship between population health and geological environment is complicated, and the evaluation method with single dimension is difficult to adapt to the increasingly complicated situation of health influencing factors. In this study, the GHI method is proposed to evaluate the health suitability of geological environment. Based on the multi-dimension of environmental geochemistry, regional geological background, climate condition and human activity intensity, the evaluation index system and evaluation method of geological environmental health suitability are studied from a composite perspective. The GHI evaluation method could be used for regional geological environment evaluation and zoning, and the evaluation results could help manage a more habitable environment and improve the health level of the population. However, there are still some limitations to this approach: ①There is no grouping of the target population. ②The exposure time is not considered. ③The actual intake of water and food is not confirmed. To sum up, the method will be continuously improved by refining the index system, to develop a health suitability assessment method with greater spatial heterogeneity that could meet the needs of the public and government to the greatest extent.

圖  1   影響人群健康的地質(zhì)環(huán)境要素系統(tǒng)

Figure  1.   The conceptual linkage between human health and geological environmental factors. There ’re various geological environmental factors affecting human health in a composite way. Geological background characteristics, climate conditions, geochemistry behavior of elements and chemicals, as well as various human activities that have a profound impact on various geological processes, contribute jointly to an endemic public health status in a region.

表  1   地質(zhì)環(huán)境健康適宜性評價指標體系組成與相應權重

Table  1   The evaluation indexes of geological suitability for human health and the corresponding weights.

總指數(shù)分指數(shù)（權重）指標（權重） 地質(zhì)環(huán)境健康適宜性
（GHI）氣候條件
（0.32）人體舒適度 （0.256）極端天氣發(fā)生率（0.064）地質(zhì)背景
（0.16）區(qū)域地殼穩(wěn)定性（0.024）天然環(huán)境放射性（0.040）海拔高度（0.056）植被覆蓋率（0.040）環(huán)境地球化學
（0.36）環(huán)境空氣質(zhì)量（0.108）灌溉水質(zhì)量（0.043）飲用水質(zhì)量（0.058）耕地土壤質(zhì)量（0.043）農(nóng)產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量（0.050）人均水資源量（0.029）人均土地資源量（0.029）人類活動強度
（0.16）人口密度（0.080）人均工農(nóng)業(yè)生產(chǎn)總值（0.080）

表  2   地質(zhì)環(huán)境健康適宜性評價等級

Table  2   GHI scores and the corresponding human health suitability levels.

級別指數(shù)描述 優(yōu)GHI≥85極適宜良75 ≤GHI<85適宜一般60≤GHI<75較適宜較差50≤GHI<60可能適宜差GHI<50不適宜

表  3   GHI法在浙江安吉與龍游兩地的應用

Table  3   Case study in Anji and Longyou by GHI assessment.

應用地區(qū)基礎評價綜合評價結(jié)果氣候狀況地質(zhì)背景環(huán)境地球化學質(zhì)量人類活動強度總指數(shù)得分 浙江安吉7092.576.58578.16良浙江龍游7092.596.48585.50優(yōu) [1]

Selinus O, Alloway B, Centeno J A, et al. Essentials of medical geology: Revised edition[M]. Springer: Springer Netherlands, 2013: 1?805.

[2]

US EPA. Exposure factors handbook[S]. Washington DC: US EPA, 2011.

[3]

US EPA. Risk assessment guidance for superfund volume I human health evaluation manual （Part A）[S]. Washington DC: US EPA, 1989.

[4]

European Commission Joint Research Center, Institute for Health and Consumer Protection. Exposure factors sourcebook for Europe[S]. 2006.

[5] 蔣玉丹,王建生,黃炳昭,等. 國外環(huán)境健康風險管理實踐與啟示[J]. 環(huán)境與可持續(xù)發(fā)展,2019,44(5):9?14. doi: 10.19758/j.cnki.issn1673-288x.201905009

Jiang Y D,Wang J S,Huang B Z,et al. Environmental health risk management practices in developed countries and its implications[J]. Environment and Sustainable Development, 2019, 44(5):9?14. doi: 10.19758/j.cnki.issn1673-288x.201905009

[6]

David J B. A framework for integrated environmental health impact assessment of systemic risks[J]. Environmental Health, 2008(7):61.

[7]

Farland W H. The United-States—Environmental-protection—Risk assessment guidelines—Current status and future—Directions[J]. Toxicology and Industrial Health, 1992, 8(3):205?212. doi: 10.1177/074823379200800306

[8] 王秀峰. 我國健康影響評估現(xiàn)狀與問題件及建議[J]. 人口與健康,2019(4):16?19.

Wang X F. Health impact assessment status quo and problems and suggestions[J]. Population and Health, 2019(4):16?19.

[9]

Bundschuh J,Maity J P,Mushtaq S,et al. Medical geology in the framework of the sustainable development goals[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017(581-582):87?104.

[10] 王焰新. “同一健康”視角下醫(yī)學地質(zhì)學的創(chuàng)新發(fā)展[J]. 地球科學,2020,45(4):1093?1102.

Wang Y X. Innovative development of medical geology:A one health perspective[J]. Earth Science, 2020, 45(4):1093?1102.

[11] 舒良樹. 普通地質(zhì)學（第4版）[M]. 北京: 地質(zhì)出版社, 2020: 1?326.

Shu L S. Physical geology （The 4th edition）[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2020: 1?326.

[12] 羅衛(wèi),黃滿湘. 地質(zhì)環(huán)境與地方病[J]. 地質(zhì)災害與環(huán)境保護,2004(4):1?4,14. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4362.2004.04.001

Luo W,Huang M X. Geological environment and endemic diseases[J]. Journal of Geological Hazards and Environment Preservation, 2004(4):1?4,14. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4362.2004.04.001

[13]

Romanello M, Napoli C, Drummond P, et al. The 2022 report of the Lancet countdown on health and climate change: Health at the mercy of fossil fuels[J]. Lancet, 2022, 400:1619?1654. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01540-9

[14]

Price T R V,Barua S K. Identifying vulnerable populations and transmission pathways by geographic correlation of the environment to human health[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 779:14626.

[15]

Brevik P,Anenberg S C,Neumann J E,et al. Effects of increasing aridity on ambient dust and public health in the U. S. southwest under climate change[J]. GeoHealth, 2019, 3(5):127?144. doi: 10.1029/2019GH000187

[16] 李振林,翟曉燕. 淺析影響人類健康的地質(zhì)環(huán)境[J]. 陜西煤炭,2004(2):6?8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-749X.2004.02.002

Li Z L,Zhai X Y. Simply analysis on the influence of geological environment on human health[J]. Shaanxi Coal, 2004(2):6?8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-749X.2004.02.002

[17]

Wardrop N A,le Blond J S. Assessing correlations between geological hazards and health outcomes:Addressing complexity in medical geology[J]. Environment International, 2015(84):90?93.

[18] 張文忠. 宜居城市建設的核心框架[J]. 地理研究,2016,35(2):205?213. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201602001

Zhang W Z. The core framework of the livable city construction[J]. Geographical Research, 2016, 35(2):205?213. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201602001

[19] 張文忠,湛東升. “國際一流的和諧宜居之都”的內(nèi)涵及評價指標[J]. 城市發(fā)展研究,2017,24(6):116?124,132. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2017.06.016

Zhang W Z,Zhan D S. Study on connotation and evaluation index of world-class metropolis of harmony and livability[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2017, 24(6):116?124,132. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2017.06.016

[20] 王秀峰,蘇劍楠,王昊. “健康中國”建設監(jiān)測評估框架和指標體系研究[J]. 衛(wèi)生經(jīng)濟研究,2020,37(3):3?6. doi: 10.14055/j.cnki.33-1056/f.2020.03.001

Wang X F,Su J N,Wang H. Research on the monitoring and evaluation framework and indicator system of “Healthy China”[J]. Health Economics Research, 2020, 37(3):3?6. doi: 10.14055/j.cnki.33-1056/f.2020.03.001

[21] 吳初國, 劉樹臣, 劉迪, 等. 國土資源可持續(xù)發(fā)展指標體系探索與實踐[J]. 北京:地質(zhì)出版社,2006:1?315.

Wu C G, Liu S C, Liu D, et al. Exploration and practice of indicator system for sustainable development of land and resources[J]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2006:1?315.

[22]

Cavicchioli R,Ripple W J,Timmis K N,et al. Scientists’ warning to humanity:Microorganisms and climate change[J]. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2019(17):569?586.

[23]

McMichael A J,Woodruff R E,Hales S. Climate change and human health:Present and future risks[J]. Lancet, 2006, 367(9513):859?869. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68079-3

[24] 劉方,張金良. 氣象因素對人類健康的影響[J]. 中國公共衛(wèi)生雜志,2005,21(3):367?369.

Liu F,Zhang J L. Impact of meteorological factors on human health[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2005, 21(3):367?369.

[25] 陶芳芳,闞海東,董晨,等. 上海市流感樣病例與氣象因素關系的研究[J]. 中華流行病學雜志,2010(12):1448?1449. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2010.12.035

Tao F F,Kan H D,Dong C,et al. Analysis on the relationship between influenza and meteorology and the establishment of early warning model[J]. Chinese Journal of Epidemiology, 2010(12):1448?1449. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2010.12.035

[26] 李山,孫美淑,張偉佳,等. 中國大陸1961—2010年間氣候舒適期的空間格局及其演變[J]. 地理研究,2016(35):2053?2070.

Li S,Sun M S,Zhang W J,et al. Spatial patterns and evolving characteristics of climate comfortable period in the mainland of China:1961—2010[J]. Geographical Research, 2016(35):2053?2070.

[27] 翟盤茂,周佰銓,陳陽,等. 氣候變化科學方面的幾個最新認知[J]. 氣候變化研究進展,2021,17(6):629?635.

Zhai P M,Zhou B Q,Chen Y,et al. Several new understandings in the climate change science[J]. Climate Change Research, 2021, 17(6):629?635.

[28]

Wang Y,Wang A,Zhai J,et al. Tens of thousands additional deaths annually in cities of China between 1.5℃ and 2.0℃ warming[J]. Nature Communications, 2019, 10(1):1?7. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07882-8

[29] 舒章康,李文鑫,張建云,等. 中國極端降水和高溫歷史變化及未來趨勢[J]. 中國工程科學,2022(5):116?125.

Shu Z K,Li W X,Zhang J Y,et al. Historical changes and future trends of extreme precipitation and high temperature in China[J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 2022(5):116?125.

[30] 許志琴,楊經(jīng)綏,朱文斌. 再論大陸動力學發(fā)展面臨的重大挑戰(zhàn)[J]. 地質(zhì)學報,2021,95(1):2?3.

Xu Z Q,Yang J S,Zhu W B. Introduction:Re-exploration the major challenge of the development on continental dynamics[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2021, 95(1):2?3.

[31]

Wang Y X,Wang Q R,Deng Y M,et al. Assessment of the impact of geogenic and climatic factors on global risk of urinary stone disease[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 721:137769. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137769

[32]

Gwenzi W. Occurrence,behaviour,and human exposure pathways and health risks of toxic geogenic contaminants in serpentinitic ultramafic geological environments (SUGEs):A medical geology perspective[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020(700):134622.

[33] 馬緒宣, 劉飛, 黃河, 等. 花崗巖、氡氣與人類肺癌[J/OL]. 地質(zhì)學報(2022-11-23)[2023-01-18]. doi: 10.19762/j.cnki.dizhixuebao.2022186.

Ma X X, Liu F, Huang H, et al. Granite, radongas and human lung cancer[J/OL]. Acta Geologica Sinica (2022-11-23)[2023-01-18]. doi: 10.19762/j.cnki.dizhixuebao.2022186.

[34]

Zeeb H, Shannoun F. WHO handbook on indoor radon: A public health perspective[M]. Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2009: 42?47.

[35] 馬婧婧,曾菊新. 中國鄉(xiāng)村長壽現(xiàn)象與人居環(huán)境研究:以湖北鐘祥為例[J]. 地理研究,2012,31(3):450?460.

Ma J J,Zeng J X. Study on the longevity phenomena and human settlements in rural China:Taking Zhongxiang City as an example[J]. Geographical Research, 2012, 31(3):450?460.

[36] 郭鄭旻,黃付敏,陸慧,等. 不同海拔高度對健康成年男性心臟血流動力學和心電圖的影響[J]. 中國應用生理學雜志,2012,28(1):1?4. doi: 10.13459/j.cnki.cjap.2012.01.003

Guo Z M,Huang F M,Lu H,et al. Effects of different altitudes on cardiac hemodynamics and electrocardiogram of healthy male adults[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Physiology, 2012, 28(1):1?4. doi: 10.13459/j.cnki.cjap.2012.01.003

[37]

Mairer K,Wille M,Bucher T,et al. The prevalence of and risk factors for acute mountain sickness in the eastern and western Alps[J]. High Altitude Medicine & Biology, 2010, 11(4):343?348.

[38]

Calderon-Gerstein H,Torres-Samaniego G. High altitude and cancer:An old controversy[J]. Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology, 2021, 289:103655.

[39]

Mairer K,Wille M,Bucher T,et al. Prevalence of acute mountain sickness in the eastern Alps[J]. High Altitude Medicine & Biology, 2009, 10(3):239?245.

[40]

Najafi E,Khanjani N,Ghotbi M R,et al. The association of gastrointestinal cancers (esophagus,stomach,and colon) with solar ultraviolet radiation in Iran — An ecological study[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2019, 191(3):152. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7263-0

[41]

Diener A,Mudu P. How can vegetation protect us from air pollution? A critical review on green spaces’ mitigation abilities foe air-borne particles from a public health perspective-with implications for urban planning[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 796:148605. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148605

[42]

Kumar P,Druckman A,Gallagher J,et al. The nexus between air pollution,green infrastructure and human health[J]. Environmental International, 2019, 133:105181. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105181

[43]

Pugh T A M,MacKenzie A R,Whyatt J D,et al. Effectiveness of green infrastructure for improvement of air quality in urban street canyons[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 4(14):7692?7699.

[44] 王學求,柳青青,劉漢糧,等. 關鍵元素與生命健康:中國耕地缺硒嗎?[J]. 地學前緣,2021,28(3):412?423. doi: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2021.1.13

Wang X Q,Liu Q Q,Liu H L,et al. Key elements and human health:Is China’s arable land selenium-deficient?[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2021,28(3):412?423. doi: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2021.1.13

[45]

Tan J A,Zhu W Y,Wang W Y,et al. Selenium in soil and endemic diseases in China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2002, 284:227?235. doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(01)00889-0

[46]

Cong X,Xu X,Xu L,et al. Elevated biomarkers of sympatho-adrenomedullary activity linked to e-waste air pollutant exposure in preschool children[J]. Environment International, 2018, 115:117?126. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.03.011

[47]

Ren X,Yao L,Xue Q,et al. Binding and activity of tetrabromobisphenol A mono-ether structural analogs to thyroid hormone transport proteins and receptors[J]. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2020, 128(10):107008?1. doi: 10.1289/EHP6498

[48] 邰蘇日噶拉,李永春,周文輝,等. 寧夏固原市原州區(qū)高氟地區(qū)氟對人體健康的影響[J]. 巖礦測試,2021,40(6):919?929. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0254-5357.2021.6.ykcs202106011

Tai Surigala,Li Y C,Zhou W H,et al. Effect of fluorine on human health in high-fluorine areas in Yuanzhou District,Guyuan City,Ningxia Autonomous Region[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2021, 40(6):919?929. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0254-5357.2021.6.ykcs202106011

[49]

Lin X,Xu X,Zeng X,et al. Decreased vaccine antibody titers following exposure to multiple metals and metalloids in e-waste-exposed preschool children[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2017, 220(Part A):354?363.

[50]

Morrison J M,Goldhaber M B,Mills C T,et al. Weathering and transport of chromium and nickel from serpentinite in the coast range ophiolite to the Sacramento Valley,California,USA[J]. Applied Geochemistry, 2015, 61:72?86. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2015.05.018

[51]

Majumder S,Banik P. Geographical variation of arsenic distribution in paddy soil,rice and ricebased products:A meta-analytic approach and implications to human health[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 233:184?199.

[52]

Fordyce F M,Brereton N,Hughes J,et al. An initial study to assess the use of geological parent materials to predict the Se concentration in overlying soils and in five staple foodstuffs produced on them in Scotland[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2010, 408(22):5295?5305. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.08.007

[53]

Mohtashami R,Dehnavi M M,Balouchi H,et al. Improving yield,oil content and water productivity of dryland canola by supplementary irrigation and selenium spraying[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2020, 232:106046. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106046

[54]

Li D,Liu H,Gao M,et al. Effects of soil amendments,foliar sprayings of silicon and selenium and their combinations on the reduction of cadmium accumulation in rice[J]. Pedosphere, 2022, 32(4):649?659. doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(21)60052-8

[55]

Kanem N,Murray C J L,Horton R. The Lancet commission on 21st-Century global health threats[J]. The Lancet, 2022, 401:10?11.

[56] 宋明義. 浙西地區(qū)下寒武統(tǒng)黑色巖系中硒與重金屬的表生地球化學及環(huán)境效應[D]. 合肥: 合肥工業(yè)大學, 2009: 1?143.

Song M Y. Supergenic geochemistry and environmental effects of selenium and heavy metals in the lower Cambrian black series of western Zhejiang Province, China[D]. Hefei: Hefei University of Technology, 2009: 1?143.

[57] 胡艷華,王加恩,蔡子華,等. 浙北嘉善地區(qū)土壤硒的含量、分布及其影響因素初探[J]. 地質(zhì)科技情報,2010,29(6):84?88.

Hu Y H,Wang J E,Cai Z H,et al. Content distribution and influencing factors of selenium in soil of Jiashan area northern Zhejiang Province[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2010, 29(6):84?88.

[58] 胡艷華,王加恩,顏鐵增,等. 浙北平原區(qū)土壤硒地球化學研究[J]. 上海地質(zhì),2010,31(S1):103?106.

Hu Y H,Wang J E,Yan T Z,et al. Preliminary geochemistry research about selenium in soil,northern plain area of Zhejiang Province[J]. Shanghai Geology, 2010, 31(S1):103?106.

[59]

Alahuhta J,Tukiainen H,Toivanen M,et al. Acknowledging geodiversity in safeguarding biodiversity and human health[J]. Lancet Planet Health, 2022, 6:e987?e992. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00259-5

[60] 伊芹,程皝,尚文郁. 土壤硒的存在特征及分析測試技術研究進展[J]. 巖礦測試,2021,40(4):461?475. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.202006230095

Yi Q,Cheng H,Shang W Y. Review on characteristics of selenium in soil and related analytical techniques[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2021, 40(4):461?475. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.202006230095

相關知識

環(huán)境影響評價評價的方法環(huán)境健康影響評價
河流生態(tài)環(huán)境健康評價方法研究
環(huán)境質(zhì)量與健康評價.pptx
環(huán)境影響評價的方法三、環(huán)境健康影響評價.ppt
產(chǎn)品生命周期環(huán)境友好性評價方法研究.pdf
健康住宅評價體系——HiH健康標識（室內(nèi)環(huán)境）發(fā)布
什么是環(huán)境評估與環(huán)境影響評價？
健康、安全與環(huán)境管理體系評價證書（HSE評價證書）
環(huán)境污染人群健康損害評估體系研究
我國環(huán)境和健康風險評價體系的現(xiàn)狀與思考.docx

網(wǎng)址: 地質(zhì)環(huán)境健康適宜性評價指標體系與評價方法研究 http://m.u1s5d6.cn/newsview352308.html